您要查找的是不是：
- Does Sima Tan Write History? “司马谈作史”说质疑
- We do not need to invent a good story - We write history since 1886. 我们不需要去编造一个动听的故事-自从1886年我们就书写了历史。
- The world does not allow heroes to exist. Those who write history are those who kill heroes. 这个世界不会允许英雄存在，谱写历史的人，都是杀掉英雄的人。
- Did SIMA Qian Break through the Traditional National Thoughts? 司马迁有没有突破传统民族思想?
- Different Views between Sima Qian and Sima Tan 司马谈、司马迁思想异同辨
- Tts written history goes back about 3,500 years. 有文字记载的历史可以上溯到3，500年之前。
- You can pick out the important bits ,for it is one thing to write a letter ,another to write history. 你可以择要摘取，因为写信是一回事。写历史是另一回事
- Bush added, everyone who writes history is prejudiced. “他们或者支持我，或者反对我，他他们自有其观点。”
- Immediately, at its eleventh UNITA WAR will begin, we look forward to out of obstacles, to write history in the 50 world. 马上，第十一届盟战即将拉开大幕，我们期待能杀出重围，在50历史中写下浓墨重彩的一笔。
- Two important stages came not so long before the dawn of written history. 有两个重要阶段是在有文字记载的历史出现之前不久开始的。
- Shakespeare wrote histories and tragedies. 莎士比亚写过历史剧和悲剧。
- Now each of the 55 minority ethnic groups has a brief written history. 现在，中国55个少数民族都各自有了一部文字记载的简史。
- Tolstoy's historicism is a reaction against a method of writing history. 托尔斯泰的历史决定论是对一种写历史的方法的抗议。
- This place doesn't have a very savory reputation. 这个地方的名声可不太好。
- Styron does not follow the traditional western way of writing history from the top down (e.g. critical historical figures) or in grand narrative strokes (e.g. grand historical scenes). 在这本小说中,史泰伦并没有沿袭当时西方传统的书写历史的方法,即或自上而下(譬如一些关键的历史人物)或宏大的叙述手法(譬如庞大的历史场面)。
- There was the battle-cry ahead of Bayern that the team was off to write history after drawing the first leg 2-2, the performances against Messina and Ascoli, taking Gourcuff under his wing. 比如在首回合2：2后，对阵拜仁书写历史后的怒吼；在与梅西纳和阿斯科利比赛中的表演者，与古尔库夫的拥抱等。
- He does not just write for fun; write is his bread and butter. 他写作并不只是为了乐趣，那是他的谋生方式。
- This sentence doesn't make sense. 这个句子没有意义。
- Sima Tan 司马谈
- If everyone does his part, the project will surely be a success. 如果大家都尽责，这个项目肯定会成功。
